Published January 22nd 2021
The PR industry has traditionally been lousy at measuring the value of its work. That’s all changing, with the introduction of robust frameworks, tools, and greater access to data.
This article started life as a discussion on Twitter about which monitoring vendors provided outdated and legacy PR metrics as part of their product or service.
It turned out that there’s a lot still to do.
The thread caught the attention of the BuzzSumo team, and they asked me to write a best practice guide about how to measure PR. Here it is.
Measuring the value of your work and contribution to an organization is critical to receiving proper remuneration and investment.
In marketing and PR that means demonstrating the impact in terms of outcomes that are aligned to the business.
The closer that you can tie the value you deliver to the objectives of the organisation the more you’ll be valued.
The dividend will pay out in budget and salary. It’s common sense.
Francis Ingham is among a group of individuals within the PR industry that have dedicated significant professional energy to improving PR measurement.
“The PR industry’s focus on measurement and analytics is helping to improve its value and reputation. It is enabling us to recruit and retain talent. The use of dinosaur metrics continues to decline,” said Francis Ingham, Director General, PRCA and CEO, ICCO.
Measuring helps you to define the success of your PR activities.
Best practice PR measurement should start and end with an organizational plan.
This informs the objectives and metrics of communication and PR activity, as well as the audience, content, and desired outcome of activity – whether that be:
Measurement should be used as a continuous process throughout the lifecycle of a campaign.
It’s a performance tool for real time campaign management.
The PR industry has traditionally simplified PR measurement to a single metric.
The advertising value of the media coverage generated by activity has been used as a proxy for value.
This reductionist approach has its origins in the marketing team, as a means of benchmarking earned media and paid media.
Simplifying PR activity to a single metric is plainly wrong. It makes no sense as a means of measuring communication or organizational success.
Advertising Equivalent Value (AVE) refers to the advertising cost of editorial coverage, and is used as a means of determining the value of editorial media coverage.
It continues to be the scourge of the PR industry, and has a stranglehold because it’s so simple – but it’s far from the best example of how to measure PR.
AMEC has set out a manifesto denouncing AVE in its call on the PR business to professionalise. It includes the comparison of earned and paid media.
“While the trend for the use of AVE continues to be downward, in some regions AVE is still far too prevalent, with the oft repeated excuse that it is being produced ‘because the client demands it.” Richard Bagnall, AMEC
There’s ongoing debate within the PR sector about banning AVEs.
The CIPR and PRCA give zero marks for measurement in awards submissions if they are used but still AVE has a tight grip on the industry.
Many media monitoring vendors continue to provide data.
There is no standard metric for PR but there is a common framework that can be applied to PR planning and measurement.
It’s an approach built by the International Association of Measurement and Evaluation of Communication (AMEC), and it encompasses all forms of integrated media (or PESO) for short:
The Integrated Measurement Framework was initially launched in 2017. It is a comprehensive website of resources and an interactive tool. It sets out a best practice approach to PR measurement that can be used for any PR activity or campaign.
The Integrated Measurement Framework is a genuine breakthrough in the measurement of PR activity.
It was based on a set of principles defined at an AMEC meeting in Barcelona in 2010 under the leadership of Dr David Rockland.
The principles have evolved to reflect the evolution of practice and media.
The Barcelona Principles 3.0 announced in 2019 set out seven general guidelines for best practice for how to measure PR.
AMEC has made its Integrated Evaluation Framework available as a free web application.
The interaction tool guides a user through the process of building a campaign that links organizational objectives to each of the parts of a PR campaign as follows.
|1||Objectives||PR measurement should start with clear organizational and communication objectives.|
|2||Inputs||Define the target audiences of the campaign and other inputs such as situation analysis, resource and budgets.|
|3||Activities||Activities, testing or research, content production, and all forms of media.|
|4||Outputs||This is quantitative and qualitative measures of outputs across all forms of media.|
|5||Out-takes||Response and reaction of your target audiences.|
|6||Outcomes||Impact of communications on the target audience.|
|7||Organizational Impact||Evaluation of impact against objectives.|
The increased focus on measurement in the PR industry is also raising the stakes on the use of data in PR planning.
It’s a natural complement to measurement and improves the effectiveness of every aspect of a campaign.
Notably it is used as an input to inform the development of strategy and activities.
Free sources of data for PR planning and measurement:
Planning starts by understanding the audience or public that a campaign seeks to engage as part of a communication effort.
This includes understanding the characteristics, behaviour, and motivation of an audience.
Both qualitative research such as surveys, and quantitative research such as social analytics are useful sources of insight.
Every interaction that we have on the web leaves a footprint. These data points can be used for planning and measurement.
There’s a huge amount of data that’s accessible for free or low cost.
Ad planning data is published by platforms such as Facebook and Google and there’s a growing third-party market of search and social tools vendors.
Social data can be used to inform campaigns, but also to create benchmarks that can be used as a PR metric as part of a campaign plan.
Tools such as BuzzSumo Monitoring enable you to take learnings from the outcomes of past PR activities, and inform strategy around similar activities in the future.
You can explore mention trends pertaining to articles, competitors, keywords, brands, content or backlinks, and build your learning into future PR campaigns.
Outputs, out-takes and outcomes are frequently confused, and incorrectly used as key performance indicators and as the basis of calculating return on investment.
Proceed with caution if you want to avoid a flawed approach to PR metrics.
Outputs are a measure of organizational activity. They’re easy to measure as a unit of work by an agency or organization.
Out-takes are the results of outputs. They are often used incorrectly as a proxy for outcomes.
Measurement should be based on outcomes that can be measured directly against organizational objectives.
Lynn PR is a strategic communications agency that uses a behavioral science approach. It conducts behavioural diagnostics to better understand what specific actions are needed to drive change, and what barriers exist within audiences that might stop them from taking action.
A campaign for NHS South East London Clinical Commissioning Group sought to raise awareness of mental health support services during the COVID-19 lockdown in the UK. It delivered 4.5x improvement in engagement compared with typical benchmarks, crucially reaching diverse and seldom-heard audiences.
“We use a variety of PR metrics appropriate to an activity or campaign. An out-take for a public health campaign is likely to be engagement with owned content. An outcome would be the use of a service.” Shayoni Lynn, Founder and Principal Consultant, Lynn PR
Building a robust approach to planning and measurement leaves no uncertainty of the metrics of success or failure.
It shifts measurement from a retrospective activity to real time management and PR marketing tool that can be used to monitor the effectiveness of activity.
The growing professionalism of planning and measurement in PR has been accompanied by a corresponding development in technology.
Social media and social media tools enable out-takes and outcomes to be monitored in real time.
Alongside internal organizational data, this enables campaigns to be adjusted while they’re live.
Progressive agencies communication teams are using platforms such as Google Analytics and Microsoft Power BI for real time campaign management and PR reporting to stakeholders.
My thanks to the BuzzSumo team for asking me to write this article. It’s great to see tool vendors actively promote best practice and not promote lazy or legacy metrics.
PR measurement should start and end with organizational metrics. Measure outcomes not outputs.
To better measure the out-takes and outcomes of your PR activity, why not give BuzzSumo a go? It’s free to all users for the first 30 days.
Planning your next PR campaign? Read our guide on 7 Best Practice PR Tips For Your Next Campaign.
Stephen Waddington is a professional advisor to PR agencies, Visiting Professor in Practice at Newcastle University and the author of several books on marketing and public relations. He is also the Founder and Managing Partner of Wadds Inc., a professional advisory firm, working with agencies (including Lynn PR) and communication teams.
Enter any topic, term or url to search to see BuzzSumo in action. It’s free!
100% free. No credit card required.